Built from the corpus only
Answers are assembled from data returned by the read-only corpus backend. An answer that leans on the model's own training to state a "fact" about the text is a violation, full stop.
Divine Data Answers responds to plain-language questions only from our corpus: the full 39-book Old Testament studied verse-by-verse, plus commentary, the modernized public-domain scripture text, and the catalog. Every claim carries the reference it came from and a tier label saying what kind of statement it is. Nothing is generated from a model's memory and dressed up as our work.
Book and verse counts re-derived from the study files on 2026-08-03. The document and artifact counts are the last recorded database values and were not re-verified that day; the artifact count in particular has not moved since the catalog was first built, because catalog.json has not been regenerated, so it undercounts what the corpus now holds.
The grounded-answer contract
A generic chatbot will happily answer a question about Isaiah or the demiurge from its training data: fluent, unsourced, untraceable, and not our work. Divine Data is built the opposite way.
Answers are assembled from data returned by the read-only corpus backend. An answer that leans on the model's own training to state a "fact" about the text is a violation, full stop.
Every claim carries the reference it came from — a verse ref, a document path, an artifact id — so you can check it against the source yourself.
Every statement is one of three kinds: plain-sense, anchored-with-citation, or a flagged interpretive extension explicitly labeled as ours. Never a fourth thing.
Where sources differ, it shows the variants instead of silently picking one. Where the corpus doesn't cover something, it says so rather than filling the gap from memory.
When we find we were wrong, we correct the record visibly. Our own eval write-up records a caught defect in the open rather than quietly editing it away.
The contract is checked mechanically in the answer pipeline, gated by an internal truth-veto review, and regression-tested by a golden eval before anything ships.
What an answer looks like
They aren't footnotes. They sit on every claim, styled so nothing reads as more authoritative than its tier actually is.
What does the corpus say about the suffering servant in Isaiah 53?
What the source text says on its face, quoted from the modernized public-domain scripture text carried on the study verse.
Isaiah 53:5A claim tied to a specific reference in the corpus — the verse-by-verse commentary at that location, retrieved this session, not recalled from training.
isaiah_study/ — verse commentaryThis project's Gnostic/Pistis Sophia reading, marked explicitly as our interpretation. It is never laundered into "fact" or into scholarly consensus.
labeled as ours"The corpus does not address this." When a question falls outside the 39 loaded books and their commentary, the answer says so instead of inventing one.
Illustrative layout of the three permitted statement tiers. Claim text above is a description of each tier, not a generated answer.
The corpus
All 39 Old Testament books, studied verse-by-verse through this project's Gnostic/Pistis Sophia lens, are loaded and queryable today. The study track continues, and the loader is book-agnostic — the corpus grows as books ship, including Phase B's wider shelf of Second Temple literature (1 Enoch and more), written but not yet loaded into the query engine.
Alongside the studies: commentary and analysis documents, the modernized public-domain scripture text carried on each study verse, the Pistis Sophia translation work where present in the corpus, and a catalog of project artifacts.
Proof, not adjectives
Phase 1 is a working bring-your-own-key Claude query engine over the read-only corpus, with the grounded-answer contract enforced in code. Here is the recorded state of it.
| Criterion | Result | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Grounding, citation coverage, tier labeling | 19 / 19 | 100% — hard gate, met |
| Honest refusal (out-of-corpus questions) | 7 / 7 | 100% — hard gate, met |
| Answer correctness (manual spot-check) | 18 / 19 clean (~95%) | ≥ 95% — met on that run |
| Offline test suite (no LLM calls, no database) | 129 tests passing | Runs on every change |
The correctness spot-check is not a gate you pass once: model output varies run to run, so every future live eval run gets its own fresh human review. On the recorded run it caught a real claim that overreached its citation — that finding is written into our eval record rather than quietly fixed.
Divine Data sells trustworthy access to a unique body of knowledge, not tokens.
Pricing
Answers is a bring-your-own-key product: you bring your own provider key and pay that provider directly for inference, so our cost per answer is zero and there is no metering from us. The figures below are the current pricing we are running with; our CEO's sign-off is still required before anyone is charged. Full detail, including the free path and the accessible-pricing options, is on the pricing page.
Already in every Library plan
$0 extraLibrary is $9/month, $90/year, or $180 once — Answers is included in all three, and in the $2 pay-what-you-can floor and free-on-request access.
The query tool over the free corpus, without the gated study chapters
$3 / monthFor people who want the grounded query tool, not the study Library. Cancel in one click, effective at period end.
Free forever Corpus search and citation lookup stay free across the entire corpus, gated chapters included — you can always find a passage and cite where it is, without an account.
Not offered A managed tier where we supply the key is designed on paper but is not offered and carries no price, and we are not attaching a date to it. Until commercial terms are verified, caps are demonstrated to fail closed, and spend is approved, Divine Data is bring-your-own-key only.
Every figure above is quoted from the pricing page, which is the source of truth for what Divine Data costs.
Where things actually stand
There is no signup button here, because there is nothing yet to sign up to — and putting one here would be exactly the kind of thing we've promised not to do. What exists today is a working local bring-your-own-Claude query tool over the read-only corpus, holding the grounded-answer contract, with the eval results above on the record.
In the meantime, the written corpus is complete and readable now — no account, no card, no countdown, and the ebook has real checkout.